I think there should be a limit

[Krissy]

I think there should be a limit to how many pictures are in your signature. It is getting riddiculous.

No offense to anyone.

But my computer is going really slow because of all the pictures in everyones signatures, and it takes like, 10 minutes or more to load one page! (no joke!)

I think there should be a limit, meaning one or two pictures in each persons signatures.

[vikingmaiden]

my computer is slow w/ the pics too, but even if people did limit their sigs, my comp would still be slow! but yeah, i cut out all but one of my banners cause my own pictures were annoying me! anyway, i don't really mind, it's not the end of my world...

[Gloredhel]

I don't like too many pics in one siggy either. (believe it or not from my own - I have so many that people have made me and I haven't gotten organised enough to cut it down, though I want to.) I think maybe two and a little one, like a button, would be good for me, but that is just me.

[Alessae]

I third this notion.

[Eruannatari]

Yes, not only do I hate it when the page gets strecthed, some people have 4 huge banners in their sigs that don't even look good, no offense.

[Alessae]

Yes, the more banners people havem the longer it takes my page to load. Someone I saw had SIX.

[telcontar]

you have a point... my pics are getting annoying... *goes off to edit profile*

[Frodo Baggins]

I agree also. 1 or 2 is more than enough, 3 or more gets annoying. I don't think they should be any bigger than 700x150 each either, as it takes so long to load them all for those who use dial up and also for some broadband connections, so people having more than two banners, I beg you, please concider those who have slower internet connections than yourself and take off some of your banners:)

[Herenya]

I don't have a problem loading pics, but it can be frustrating trying to find what people have written between all the pictures... I like people's banners and everything, but prehaps there needs to be a limit of sorts...